<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Last Thoughts (Maybe) on Prinergy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prepresspilgrim.com/index.php/archive/last-thoughts-maybe-on-prinergy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prepresspilgrim.com/index.php/archive/last-thoughts-maybe-on-prinergy/</link>
	<description>Cheap Printer Ink</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:13:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.prepresspilgrim.com/index.php/archive/last-thoughts-maybe-on-prinergy/comment-page-1/#comment-16281</link>
		<dc:creator>John Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prepresspilgrim.com/?p=1193#comment-16281</guid>
		<description>Where does the Nexpress Front end fall into all this? NexStation seems a natural to drive the new inkjets.

Why have 2 or 3 rip/workflows all on the Adobe based eng?

When I was at Kodak for a demo it seemed they were not high on  Creo, all pointed to Nexstation for the future of Nexpress line and that groups seems to be natural progresstion to  stream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where does the Nexpress Front end fall into all this? NexStation seems a natural to drive the new inkjets.</p>
<p>Why have 2 or 3 rip/workflows all on the Adobe based eng?</p>
<p>When I was at Kodak for a demo it seemed they were not high on  Creo, all pointed to Nexstation for the future of Nexpress line and that groups seems to be natural progresstion to  stream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

