<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Spotless Still Alive?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prepresspilgrim.com/index.php/archive/is-spotless-still-alive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prepresspilgrim.com/index.php/archive/is-spotless-still-alive/</link>
	<description>Cheap Printer Ink</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:13:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Lazerus</title>
		<link>http://www.prepresspilgrim.com/index.php/archive/is-spotless-still-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-7706</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Lazerus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 00:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prepresspilgrim.com/?p=682#comment-7706</guid>
		<description>In 2001/2002, I worked at a plant in SLC, Utah. At the time, print buyers actually had money, so we were able to do some pretty cool stuff with the 10 micron stochastic (aka &quot;Staccato&quot; in Scitexican). CMYKOG on a  Heidelberg SM102 is the only way to go. Until they call you up at 3:00 AM claiming that &quot;the plates you gave us don&#039;t match the proof&quot;. 
How the bejeezus do you make a proof on an inkjet that will ever match this? And why are they running it at 3:00 in the morning anyway? 
But I digress. We never thought of attempting spot color that way. That&#039;s a good idea! But how do you proof it? ;) 
Well, anyway, back to my drinking. Another fine post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2001/2002, I worked at a plant in SLC, Utah. At the time, print buyers actually had money, so we were able to do some pretty cool stuff with the 10 micron stochastic (aka &#8220;Staccato&#8221; in Scitexican). CMYKOG on a  Heidelberg SM102 is the only way to go. Until they call you up at 3:00 AM claiming that &#8220;the plates you gave us don&#8217;t match the proof&#8221;.<br />
How the bejeezus do you make a proof on an inkjet that will ever match this? And why are they running it at 3:00 in the morning anyway?<br />
But I digress. We never thought of attempting spot color that way. That&#8217;s a good idea! But how do you proof it? <img src='http://www.prepresspilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Well, anyway, back to my drinking. Another fine post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

