<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is JDF dead or alive?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prepresspilgrim.com/index.php/archive/is-jdf-dead-or-alive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prepresspilgrim.com/index.php/archive/is-jdf-dead-or-alive/</link>
	<description>Cheap Printer Ink</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:13:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael "PDF boy" Jahn</title>
		<link>http://www.prepresspilgrim.com/index.php/archive/is-jdf-dead-or-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-3875</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael "PDF boy" Jahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prepresspilgrim.com/?p=266#comment-3875</guid>
		<description>JDF is not dead, nor will it â€œdieâ€ anymore than the file format for Microsoft word will die - it will evolve and grow. JDF is not really thriving or becoming as widely adopted as lets say, PDF because there is not a large of an ecosystem for JDF. Vendors depend on it and are thankful it exists, as it becomes a common language for process control communication, but for JDF to become as popular as PDF and as required as PDF - we need tools. PDF became useful for prepress exchange when Peter Camps invented Enfocus PitStop - a set of tools that could help use modify PDFs into what we required. What we need is the same for workflows. I think there is a very strong possibility that JDF will thrive as Peter and his team do that with Enfocus Switch - that is, build a workflow editor that is simple to use and easy to implement. Perhaps JDF will then become our industries widely used and wildly popular â€˜portable workflow formatâ€™ PWF ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JDF is not dead, nor will it â€œdieâ€ anymore than the file format for Microsoft word will die &#8211; it will evolve and grow. JDF is not really thriving or becoming as widely adopted as lets say, PDF because there is not a large of an ecosystem for JDF. Vendors depend on it and are thankful it exists, as it becomes a common language for process control communication, but for JDF to become as popular as PDF and as required as PDF &#8211; we need tools. PDF became useful for prepress exchange when Peter Camps invented Enfocus PitStop &#8211; a set of tools that could help use modify PDFs into what we required. What we need is the same for workflows. I think there is a very strong possibility that JDF will thrive as Peter and his team do that with Enfocus Switch &#8211; that is, build a workflow editor that is simple to use and easy to implement. Perhaps JDF will then become our industries widely used and wildly popular â€˜portable workflow formatâ€™ PWF ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

